It’s undeniable fact that social media plays a crucial role in the personal and professional life of celebrities and often their reports are biased when they represent them. While some believe that a person’s popularity comes with the cost of intrusion into their personal life. In my opinion, they should also be allowed to have their personal space like any other normal person.
We have seen lot of news channels and social media are busy in covering stories about the successful personalities for obvious reasons such as professional demands and branding. For an instance, a movie actor is required to showcase his lifestyle and social activities into media lights to grab public attention. The reason for this is the success of the person is measured not only through his hard work but it also depends on the public reaction. Most of the celebrities prefer to have social media account like Twitter and Facebook and share their glamorous pictures and life style to increase their popularity and demand. On the contrary, if the celebrity is not made known to the society, they won’t have any recognition and appreciation, could also lose potential future opportunities.
However, I believe that privacy cannot be ruled out when it comes to personal life of any individual. This is because media not only tries to capture the person professional success but it also covers personal life. For example, a news channel reveals about a personal details of popular Hollywood movie star have created lot a chaos in society. Sharing his personal particulars in public form has put up the whole family under tremendous pressure and questioned by media regularly. The consequence strongly affect the mental stability of the family members and cause depression and anxiety problems. In contrast, if the personal space is not affected, it would help them to combat their issues in sophisticated manner and thus helping them to lead a normal life like other human kind.
In conclusion, although establishment and appraisal are the core elements of stardom which is often making someone more visible in public. I believe the renowned people can have a happy life if their personal life is not disturbed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ITS_JJ_NNSNN[27]
Message: Did you mean 'its undeniable fact'?
Suggestion: Its undeniable fact
It’s undeniable fact that social media plays a crucial role ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ts are biased when they represent them. While some believe that a person’s popularity...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11911357341 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70238324598 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556786703601 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8950638693 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170281859669 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642708072385 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416494007373 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118350315006 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314844838539 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.