There is no doubt that art is a crucial part of a country’s cultural heritage. Although art reflects the cultural identity of a nation, many people are diverting their attention to scientific and commercial subjects. This essay will discuss the reason behind this trend and propose some measures which might address this problem.
Looking firstly at the causes, art is not usually considered as a profitable subject like science and business. This is because people studying technological subjects earn more money in the long run compared to art students. For instance, in Bangladesh, majority of the students prefer science over arts just because of the lucrative facilities it provides, which would enable them to lead a comfortable life. Another obvious reason is that a person needs to be creative in order to excel at art. However, not all people are born with innate artistic gifts, which act as an impediment to pursue art as a career. Therefore, people are becoming reluctant towards art day by day.
To tackle this issue, two effective solutions can be administered. Firstly, the government should subsidize art and artist more. In other words, it can organize cultural events from time to time, which would open up more platforms for the artist to show-off their skills. In addition to that, funding traditional arts would draw art loving tourists to visit our country; thus, boosting the country’s economy. Secondly, government should instruct schools to make art lessons mandatory for the student. The reason for this is to search the creative potential that remains hidden in many people. By this way, government would be able to encourage students to pursue art as a career option.
In conclusion, lack of better facilities and creativity are two of the main reasons why people are losing interest in art. In my view, government would be able to combat this problem by patronizing artists and providing more incentives for the students to become interested in art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...at, funding traditional arts would draw art loving tourists to visit our country; thus, bo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15432098765 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71029131503 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8362942827 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7777777778 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254972402595 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897534294262 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514837613317 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161790404348 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512289736551 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.