There is no doubt that pollution from vehicles have become huge environmental problems both in cities and on motorways everywhere. Someone may think that the government should increase the price of fuel to solve this problem.
First of all, while it is understandable that private car is one of the main courses of the increase in pollution, higher fuel costs are likely to limit the number of drivers for long. The drivers would change their trip mode due to the high cost of the petrol. But as this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, the cost of the transportation will rise, so it would be very unpopular with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. Solving these problems is likely to need more than a simple rise in the price of petrol. However, the severe environmental disruption doesn’t just caused by the traffic and there are various other measures which could be implemented that would have a huge effect on these problems as well.
I think to tackle the the problem of pollution, cleaner fuels need to be developed. The technology is already available to produce electric cars that would be both quieter and cleaner to use. Persuading manufactures and travelers to adopt these new technologies would be a more effective strategy for improving air quality, especially in cities. On the other hand, the development of high speed also affect the environment. For example, the emission of the industrial wastes which discharged by the factories in the developing areas is another big environmental problem. The government official should concern about how to solve it as well.
In summary, I believe that increasing the level of taxation on fuel is only a short-term solution to just one environmental problem. If we wish to provide a home for our younger generation, we should to find a long-term and lasting solution to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and on motorways everywhere. Someone may think that the government should increas...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... problems as well. I think to tackle the the problem of pollution, cleaner fuels nee...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... problems as well. I think to tackle the the problem of pollution, cleaner fuels nee...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, i think, in summary, no doubt, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97133757962 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84264347605 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547770700637 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5266452422 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195104175029 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679498907424 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502260328651 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124681701465 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353891031522 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.