The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental degradation is an alarming issue that we are facing and people are relentlessly proposing different measures to deal with it. One of which is to raise the fuel price and in my opinion, though being feasible it is far from being the best solution.
On the one hand, there are several reasons to believe that a higher fuel cost could alleviate environmental contamination. Firstly, the more expensive petrol, oil and gas become, the less people tend to use it excessively for daily demand such as commuting. This leads to a plunge in CO2 gas emission which, in return, curbs the global warming and gives way for a cleaner atmosphere. Secondly, additional revenue gained from the increased fuel price would enable the government to invest in various measures in order to reduce the amount of pollutants being discharged to the environment. For instance, more funds would be made availabe for either researches of eco-friendly and renewable energy sources or development of more advanced and efficient pullution treatment system and thereby, the environment can be protected.
On the other hand, I hold the perception that increasing the fuel price is not the most effective and efficient way to combat environmental issues. There are a number of culprits causing damages to the environment such as intensive farming, deforestation and illegal discharge of waste from manufacturing activities in which imposing higher fuel price has failed to address. Furthermore, in order to protect the environment, each individuals should maintain greener and kinder lifestyles to it by classifying wastes, making use of renewable energy and refraining from burning fossil fuel. Besides, governments are advised to hold campaigns to raise people’s awareness on the consequences their actions on the surrounding environment and therefore stimulate their early accountabilities on ameliorating enviromental contamination.
In conclusion, skyrocketing fuel cost, albeit protective and preventive, does not thoroughly resolve environmental issues. There exists other vital measures which are more effective and efficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...pensive petrol, oil and gas become, the less people tend to use it excessively for d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63862928349 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22246399839 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595015576324 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8609877288 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.230769231 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151392598922 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565297775379 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498517938011 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921238483757 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157167120198 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.