The purpose of conducting scientific research projects is for practical use rather than for the sake of doing research itself. Do you agree?
In these days, people take variety of viewpoints when it comes to most daily life issues. To give an illustration, while many people believe the main purpose of conducting scientific research projects is more for practical use than for the sake of doing research itself, other hold the opinion that this is not the case. This essay offers some insights in favor of the former outlook.
There are numerous reliable grounds that support belief that the practical utilization of scientific research projects should be applied more than the sake of doing research itself. First and foremost, the cost of conducting research projects that have practical use will be more effective as it could help to improve humans’ life. This is especially true every year the government spends a lot of money on medicine industry. This is because they desire to discover and develop new drugs and vaccines for the maintenance of health and the prevention of diseases, such as HIV and cancer. Without any practical utilization, it could be argued that doing scientific research is wasted money by people since it will not bring considerable benefits in return.
In addition, ample evidence from a number of studies also suggests that scientific breakthroughs in several fields like technology, agriculture and medicine could enhance the quality of life at many different levels from the routine working of people's lives to global issues. There is no doubt that compared to those that use non-practical, using practical applications is very conducive to human. To give an illustration, some science-based technologies triggered striking changes in agriculture, enormously increasing the amount of food available to feed the world.
In conclusion, from the analysis above, it is obvious that the purpose of conducting scientific research projects is for practical use rather than for the sake of doing research itself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ne could enhance the quality of life at many different levels from the routine working of peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34105960265 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87714048513 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55298013245 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5371256958 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506141238195 0.242375264174 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178439018431 0.0925447433944 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.233006375886 0.071462118173 326% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376928024441 0.151781067708 248% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.240123753673 0.0609392437508 394% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.