The purpose of conducting scientific research projects is for practical use rather than for the sake of doing research itself. Do you agree?
In these days, people often take a variety of viewpoints when it comes to most daily life issues. To give an illustration, while many people believe that scientific research projects should be conducted for the purpose of practical use rather than for the sake of the research itself, others hold the opinions that this is not the case. This essay offers some insights in favor of the former outlook.
There are numerous reliable grounds that support the belief that scientific projects should have practical application. First and formost, it would be cost effective to conduct research projects that have practical application because such application would then help improving humans’ life. This is especially true in the in field of medicine where thousands and millions of dollars are spent every year in search of new therapy and treatment for diseases such as cancer. Without any practical application, it can be argued that people are wasting their money doing research projects which do not have any benefits in return.
In addition, ample evidence from a number of studies also suggests that the quality of humans’ life has been significantly enhanced thanks to many scientific breakthroughs in many fields such as medicine and technology. There is no doubt that these practical findings are extremely conducive to human as compared to those non-practical ones. To give an illustration, in the field of medicine, thousands of life have been saved thanks to a breakthrough in the treatment of cancer, which has remained incurable for many decades.
In conclusion, from the above analysis, it is obvious that practical application should be the key objective of scientific research projects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to improve' or 'improve'.
Suggestion: to improve; improve
...ecause such application would then help improving humans' life. This is especially t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, then, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32720588235 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86864377475 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4791913597 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.727272727 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335073385518 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110083176835 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132861289812 0.071462118173 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190688241993 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104983041421 0.0609392437508 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.