Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Upbringing of kids under poor family makes them strong for the future life hurdles as compare to who are raised in the affluent culture. In my opinion, agrees with the statement as it makes children experienced with the real world challenges on the other side, rich kids are little aware of the situations.
Firstly, the prime reason is the environmental impact in which the children get aware of the condition in the family and understand from their parents how to deal and resolve such issues. For example, the scarcity of wealth in the house teaches every individual of the home different paths to spend money wisely. Furthermore, the parents always guide their children in a way so that offspring should not face the same problem in the future. Thus, it makes them strong with precautionary steps for the future.
Secondly, the poor parents always keeps an eye on their children to know their progress and understanding with the social environment. That makes them more concern with their learnings and ability to solve problems and educate them whenever needed. Moreover, try to make them understand the future outcomes of their decisions. On the other hand, the wealthy guardians are little worried about the future possibilities as their mindsets are more focused on earnings, thus are unfocused in teaching their young one's on the fate.
In conclusion, social surrounding is the important factor for any kids to understand the society needs and current problems and dealing with such issues makes them stronger for the future. Hence, parental guidance and influence from the environment has major role to play in the development of teenagers mindset for the destiny.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onary steps for the future. Secondly, the poor parents always keeps an eye on ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13818181818 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63420852353 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1029058243 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127899876871 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490032204745 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351308084831 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834525079015 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447353383999 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.