City and suburban transportation system does not meet the needs of commuters who come to work in the city, and needs to be changed.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Modern world demands a rapid transportation system but many large cities still lack a well-arranged network of buses and trains. Many students and workers from the outskirts of the city come to the center of the cities where all the workplaces, schools and colleges are usually situated. Therefore, it needs to be well-managed and the main shortcomings in this existing system are few numbers of routes and it does not cover all the geographic sites. This essay discusses these two in detail.
The first shortcoming of the existing system is that there are only a few numbers of bus and train routes due to which passengers have to wait for hours in order to commute from home to work or school. Waiting for a long time is not liked especially when there is an urgent situation, for example, in case of an ailing relative or when there is an urgent meeting. Additionally, this waiting time is generally a wastage of time, people use this time for playing games on phone or deleting e-mails and only a few utilize this time for any fruitful activity like reading a book.
In addition to the above, another failing is that existing transportation system does not cover every corner of the city or suburbs and in order to reach a bus stop or railway station citizens need to walk a lot. It is not possible for everyone to walk a few kilometers every day, for instance, senior citizens and small children find it extremely difficult to walk for a long time. Further, these bus stops or train stops are very few in number especially in the suburbs and consequently commuting from suburb becomes more difficult.
To conclude, the present transportation system has many problems and does not fully meet the current demand. The two main reasons behind this are very few buses or train routes and lack of coverage of the whole geographic area by the buses and the trains.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: few
...these bus stops or train stops are very few in number especially in the suburbs and consequen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: FEW_IN_NUMBER[1]
Message: Use simply 'few'.
Suggestion: few
...these bus stops or train stops are very few in number especially in the suburbs and consequen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73619631902 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62464140779 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503067484663 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.4697701776 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159298026702 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065361367699 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052420035145 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102106973154 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483804795637 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.