As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this technological era, it is being argued by many that learning non-native languages are futile, as computers can promptly and correctly translate any language for us. I substantially disagree with this notion, despite computers being powerful translators, grasping new language enriches the skills of an individual, and help people bond better with the native speakers of the language.
Studying new languages offer numerous benefits such as enhancing thinking skills, promoting connectivity with the people speaking the same language. First and foremost, when people start engaging in learning new language, their mind become more open and receptive of new ideas. Furthermore, when people travel to another country and communicate with the locals in their language, it helps them in developing a relation with locals and understands their culture better. To add on, computers can never bring emotions in their translation, whereas humans can say a same sentence in different ways by adding emotional factor.
Although learning a language has various advantages, computer translators cannot be underestimated. one, not everyone has time and money to learn new languages. So, when people travel they can use translators to talk to the local residents, to enquire about the surroundings. Two, they can be helpful when people do not usually deal with foreign languages and need it rarely for some urgent work. However, aforementioned positives are fruitful only in time of emergency, when a person is helpless and cannot comprehend the meaning of a language. also, it is never assured that internet or technical devices are available everywhere when needed.
To conclude, advancement in computer technology can be used to translate one language to another, but it can never replace a human’s mind owing to the creativity and emotional touch added by the individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...r translators cannot be underestimated. one, not everyone has time and money to lea...
^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...t comprehend the meaning of a language. also, it is never assured that internet or t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49310344828 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99529754318 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6825754 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.538461538 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162208330113 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668251660606 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564777314819 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107844309699 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051279606604 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.