Things like puzzles, board games and pictures can contribute to a child’s development. What would you give a child to help him/her develop and why? Give details and examples in your explanation.

Essay topics:

Things like puzzles, board games and pictures can contribute to a child’s development. What would you give a child to help him/her develop and why? Give details and examples in your explanation.

Focusing on child’s advancement is a major concern for parents. Therefore, parents try to facilitate their children with things such as puzzles, games, so that they can accelerate the brain development of the child. Considering all the available options, puzzles are the best suitable option to endure growth of children, owing to it’s numerous benefits such as mind engrossment, problem solving skills, interest realization.
Although board games and images have a huge role to play in childhood days, puzzles are quintessential for child growth, as they help in mind development and problem solving skills.
Firstly, as puzzle challenges children to produce a desired result, this helps them in utilizing grey matter of their brain, hence better brain nourishment. To illustrate, children who have interest in puzzles, always perform better in studies, than their counterparts. Secondly, analytical skills increases drastically when children engage their mind to produce a desire output while playing quizzes.

Another, persuasive benefit of mind engaging puzzles is that it helps in constructing the interests of a child. Not only children enjoy the pleasure of playing mind games, but also they start displaying their liking and disliking. To elucidate, while playing with puzzles children demonstrate behavior like they are not interested to solve a puzzle related to police station, but they are interested to solve a puzzle relate to a hospital. However, this can never ensure their future choice, but at least they start to develop a taste and individuality. Aforementioned points make puzzles highly considerable to help in building an intellectual individual, albeit other options are also affective.

In conclusion, the most suitable present for a child could be any mind engaging puzzle which enhances their creative and logical skills.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m solving skills, interest realization. Although board games and images have a h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ldren demonstrate behavior like they are not interested to solve a puzzle relate...
^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r like they are not interested to solve a puzzle related to police station, but ...
^^
Line 5, column 702, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lbeit other options are also affective. In conclusion, the most suitable presen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nces their creative and logical skills.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, at least, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60424028269 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93745223858 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.72762293 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125159369303 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552740340129 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048059108095 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826335156447 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471227992113 0.056905535591 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.