Things like puzzles, board games, and pictures can contribute to a child’s development. What would you give a child to help him/her develop and why? Give details and examples in your explanation.
Parents should spend more time with their children on reading books with pictures and playing board games for entertainment in order to get the best progress output. When it comes to me, I strongly believe that games with lots of pictures and simple shape puzzles are crucial for boosting infants’ skills and abilities.
It is clear that showing variety of colorful pictures to toddlers catches their interest and develops their pictorial memory. It is playing games with those pictures in the following years that has even more benefits such as differentiation of colors and figures. For instance, even though my daughter was not able to differentiate colors or figures in books I showed her at the first year, she managed to do it after six months just by monitoring the same pictures I was showing her that time. The reason why pictures are of pivotal importance for toddler development is that eyes are our main sensor for information input into our brain for further analysis. Therefore, the more pictures being viewed, the more the brain analyses and grows.
Apart from memory development, physical development via simple shape puzzles is crucial for hand-eye coordination. Although the majority of parents find this kind of gameplay complex and difficult for infants who do not succeed in placing shapes in right entries, recent UK studies show that playing with shapes effectively develops control and coordination for infants even if they fail. The reason is that children have to fail in order to achieve success. The more they engage, the faster they learn to control their body. Thus, engaging games with physical work boosts body control capabilities of children.
In conclusion, playing pictures games with children from the early years is beneficial for their brain development and growth and games with shapes are good for them because of its further skill development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21824104235 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6421215268 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7390960116 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0779486837402 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312708200247 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203983728722 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531247638435 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018950214524 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.