Things like puzzles, board games, and pictures can contribute to a child’s development. What would you give a child to help him/her develop and why? Give details and examples in your explanation.
Parents should spend more time with their children on reading books with pictures and playing board games for entertainment in order to get the best development output. When it comes to me, I strongly believe that games with lots of pictures and simple shape puzzles are crucial for boosting infants’ skills and abilities.
Needless to say that showing variety of colorful pictures to toddlers catches their interest and develops their pictorial memory. It is playing games with those pictures in the following years that has even more benefits such as differentiation of colors and figures. For instance, even though my daughter was not able to differentiate colors or figures in books I showed her at the first year, she managed to do it after six months just by monitoring the same pictures I was showing her that time. The reason why pictures are of pivotal importance for toddler development is that eyes are our main sensor for information input into our brain for further analysis. Therefore, the more pictures being viewed, the more brain analyses and grows.
Apart from memory development, physical development via simple shape puzzles is crucial for hand coordination control synchronization with brain. Although majority of parents find this kind of gameplay complex and difficult for infants who do not succeed in placing shapes in right entries, recent UK studies show that playing with shapes effectively develops control and coordination for infants even if they fail. The reason is that children have to fail in order to achieve success. The more they engage, the faster they learn to control their body. Thus, engaging games with physical work boosts body control capabilities of children.
In conclusion, playing pictures game with children from early years is beneficial for their brain development and growth and games with shapes are good for them because of its engagement for body control and coordination skills development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30031948882 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72250967245 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555910543131 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8922910222 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0773213608922 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319435330986 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210302307766 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548023295626 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210347670809 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.