Many people today use their phones for sending texts more than talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages?
To majority of smartphone user’s communication via typing is the most widespread method compared with conversation by ordinary calls. Drawing on observations, I would contend that message sending software’s perks such as being inexpensive and convenient means of communication outweigh its only setback in being slow way of information transfer.
In no way speed of speaking via cellular phone with respect to pace of texting to be understated. To some individuals what makes sending messages boring is the need to input characters thus they prefer to chat via phone instead. A vivid example is the explanation of complex theories, events, plans etc. where people do not possess much time to waste on typing, accordingly they prefer instant call in order to explain it faster.
Notwithstanding slow speed of text writing, the reason why texting is so popular is that it is low-cost and comfortable communication technique. Firstly, prices of SMS sending dropped significantly in the last decade, hence majority undoubtedly benefits from it. A striking example is the SMS sending among students in Azerbaijan, who are the main crowd using this low-cost opportunity. Secondly, advanced development of texting applications made the messaging advantageous for several purposes. It is the texting programs that not only users, but also advertisement companies use when sending social messages to large number of people. At the same time, practical advantage of texting software is that it can be used when called person is sleeping or driving therefore unable to answer the call immediately.
In conclusion, by learning to text faster in order to match the speed of telephone talks, messaging is dominating type of communication due to its being inexpensive than calling and comfortable with its technological advancements such as ability in being transferred to several people instantly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52559726962 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19909756172 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62457337884 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6986364401 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.538461538 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171364436105 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563596491252 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380526573069 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086955085404 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583882003291 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.