The last decades have witnessed an unprecedented increase in global brands. This trend has caused most cities all around the world become similar. While there are certainly valid arguments in contrary, it seems that the positive aspects of this phenomenon far outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, people who criticize this trend might argue that it will result in lack of diversity in the world. In fact, nowadays same goods are accessible in all regions. This issue might result in lack of freshness because there would be no new, fresh, local, and different things for people. In this case, no differences can be found in two cities such as New York and Tokyo. Thus, global brands might destroy the enjoyment of finding new nations and travel as well.
On the other hand, some other attitudes toward international brands argue that this is a positive trend when it comes to nation's reciprocal understanding. In other words, they believe when people from different regions use same products they feel more intimate to each others . to exemplify this, McDonalds is a global barnd in fast food sector. Scientists have deducted that when people understand that other nations consume the same food, it has an effect on their attitude toward that nation. Hence, the fact that countries are becoming similar help more peace in the world
By way of conclusion, although globalization might have some side effects on country's identification, the intimacy it has brought to the nations has made the world a better place to live. I once again reaffirm my point of view by giving a great value to global brands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s they feel more intimate to each others . to exemplify this, McDonalds is a globa...
^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...hey feel more intimate to each others . to exemplify this, McDonalds is a global b...
^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... giving a great value to global brands.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in fact, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98148148148 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55725148099 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0971865967 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0714285714 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194983299549 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600189158267 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052099762251 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103758784999 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531058241766 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.