As countries develop, people tend to buy more and more cars. Do you thing the advantages for the individual outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?

A nations progression is gauged by the quality of its citizen's liveliness. However, certain sophistications procured by the individuals such as a car, might be beneficial to them, at the same time it might create an unfavourable circumstance for the society they live in. This essay analyses both perspectives and demonstrates them with supporting examples.

To begin with, owning a car is not only a symbol of status anymore, but also has become a basic necessity for an individual to commute. Gone are the days, where people used a two wheeler or a public transport for their regular locomotion, as contemporary commutation expects a more comfortable atmosphere than just a travel. For example, travelling in a car allows an individual to avoid the hostile climatic conditions and also enriches their travel with their friends and family with some sort of entertainments like music and movies.

On the other hand, we live in a community where individuals are more concerned about their personal comforts than environmental hazards. The purchase of these locomotives has seen a steep raise, despite of various slogans and campaigns on elucidating consequences of pollution. This in turn results in more traffic chaos and also unimaginable number of road rash incidents. For example, a recent survey from traffic board regulation states that many of the developed Indian cities fills up various spots in the most congested cities of the world survey.

To conclude, though cars are essential and luxurious mode of travelling, they surface up with a considerable number of disadvantages to the nation than that out of an benefit to the individual. However, comfortable travelling is inevitable, hence people can start pooling their rides, at the same time government can reform its transportation to meet the expectations of the contemporary population

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
A nations progression is gauged by the quality of...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...sity for an individual to commute. Gone are the days, where people used a two wheel...
^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'public transport'.
Suggestion: public transport
...ays, where people used a two wheeler or a public transport for their regular locomotion, as contem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'travel'.
Suggestion: travel
...a more comfortable atmosphere than just a travel. For example, travelling in a car allow...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...vantages to the nation than that out of an benefit to the individual. However, com...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, for example, sort of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32653061224 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16335308195 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625850340136 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8383745804 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158976968492 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519462665803 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407586501465 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864733935773 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453281842385 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.