Cycling is more environmental friendly than other forms of transport.
Why it is not popular in many places?
How can its popularity be increased?
Cycling is always considered the healthiest mode of transport for both humans as well as the environment. Additionally, the investment in the cycle is minimal when compared to other modes of transport, but it requires physical efforts to commute and also traffic has surged a lot, that is the reason it is not popular in many regions. However, with technological advancement, the use of cycle can be increased.
In many places, people find it arduous to pedal the cycle because of traffic caused by other vehicles. For example, in cities like Mumbai, there are no separate paths to drive the bicycle, during peak hours the over-crowding of cars makes it tedious for cycling. Moreover, it requires endurance to travel long distance on cycle, it is tiresome for unfit people to commute on a bicycle daily. Furthermore, the speed is not adequate enough to reach distant places on time, these are the few drawbacks for which cycles are not competent in most places.
Nevertheless, many efforts are been taken by the government and environmentalist to increase the usages of cycles, especially in cities where pollution is rising rapidly. A separate path is created on roads to avoid hindrance for cyclist; in Japan with the implementation of this idea has resulted in a rise in the number of cycles on roads. Also, with the innovation of the electric cycle, the efforts required are relatively lesser and many companies are investing in battery-based bicycles to reduce the global warming effect.
To sum up, in spite though cycling requires lot of physical strength, still, it has many health benefits as well as with evolving rechargeable cycles people will find it convenient to travel for commutable distance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...hiest mode of transport for both humans as well as the environment Additionally the invest...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...les are not competent in most places Nevertheless many efforts are been taken by the gove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, well, for example, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97517730496 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78402220516 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 282.0 20.2975951904 1389% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1403.0 106.682146367 1315% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 282.0 20.7667163134 1358% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 108.0 7.06120827912 1529% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210537916068 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210537916068 0.084324248473 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130995574273 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690383320672 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 143.0 13.0946893788 1092% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -214.75 50.2224549098 -428% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 113.3 11.3001002004 1003% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.08 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.05 8.58950901804 257% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 114.8 10.1190380762 1134% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 10.7795591182 520% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.