Deciling of farming profession among youth. Reasons and solutions.
the farming profession has gone down for many centuries among younger generations. The reasons behind the declination in farm management are low salary and insufficient knowledge. The solutions are creating awareness and to increase the value of food items.
there are a lot of reasons for ignoring the farming job. one clear reason comes from the fact is recent graduates are not ready to show their employment as a farmer because of the revenue. For instance, someone who works as a doctor, engineer, financier are earning higher than farmers hence professional workers proudly says their profession outside where farmers won't. Additionally, youths know limited land information on the cultivation. such as they were struggling to sow the crops, choose improper methods for agriculture. these are the two major causes of avoiding farming opportunity among adults.
On the other hand, solutions can be taken into considerations are creating a proper understanding of agriculture. An obvious solution stems from the fact is people can share their hands-on with the current generation and this leads to increase the opportunities in farming. For example, in Canada, there is a separate compulsory farming course is introduced in the college terms. Lastly, if we raise the money for eatables; we could easily involve the little ones into the cultivation. As an illustration, the government reduced the price of crops for farmers only and it led to increase the involvement in the farming among youths. Therefore, if these solutions are taken into consideration, poverty will be reduced in every country.
In Conclusion, the causes of ignoring the farming profession are conspicuous due to less income and improper knowledge. Nevertheless, it is significant that the solutions about improving the farming profession among youths are to raise the food price value and increase recognition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the farming profession has gone down for ma...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... to increase the value of food items. there are a lot of reasons for ignoring the f...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...f reasons for ignoring the farming job. one clear reason comes from the fact is rec...
^^^
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utside where farmers wont. Additionally, youths know limited land information on ...
^^
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...ed land information on the cultivation. such as they were struggling to sow the crop...
^^^^
Line 2, column 532, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...hoose improper methods for agriculture. these are the two major causes of avoiding fa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e opportunities in farming. For example, in Canada, there is a separate compulsor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, lastly, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41694915254 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01280614408 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5438891386 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254471642133 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837156531843 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814800940467 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184457546835 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799040117487 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.