Earlier, people wore clothes which were related to their culture. But now, people wear same type of clothes all over the world. Is this a positive development or negative development?
Being the most essential modern trend, globalization has caused the fact that people tend to wear casual clothes that are not linked to their culture anymore. In general, this phenomenon seems to be a positive development and gives people several benefits, which will be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, the modern simplification of clothes released many inconveniences which usually were connected with national clothes in the past. For instance, despite the extremely hot climate, wearing many-layered clothes used to be ordinal in oriental and Islamic countries in the past due to religious and other specific reasons. Further, because of globalization, wild-spreading of common dressing culture has caused the establishment of wearing production by many well-known brands all over the world, which influenced positively on the final price for consumers. Moreover, this tendency has extended labour market in these countries and contributed to economic development. For instance, many famous brands have manufacturing in developing countries.
However, some people believe in the negative impact of this phenomenon and tend to emphasize the ethnic identity and countries heritage of national clothes. Also, they consider that the lack of individuality in national clothing always causes loss of unique characteristics of society and may provoke disappearing or vanishing of some cultures. Finally, wearing of the same type of clothes may break social and cultural barriers among populations of different countries.
All in all, in the globalization era, national clothes tend to lose their importance. Being more practical, it seems to be a positive trend and affects the global economy positively and decreases the final price of garments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous and other specific reasons. Further, because of globalization, wild-spreading...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68560606061 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07597914936 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0268004336 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.083333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331549628527 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107932259221 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542150731918 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185040635014 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458036077734 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.