Eco-tourism often involves visiting remote and fragile ecosystems, which raises concerns about the impact on local cultures and indigenous communities.
What problems can this cause?
How can these problems be resolved?
In today's world, Tourism has gained popularity worldwide. This is because of globalisation. Eco-tourism has become a part of traveling remote and destroying ecosystems, the exploitation of local culture and indigenous groups are apressing concerns. In this essay, I will examine this issue and elucidate the reasons and solutions to mitigate the issue related to it.
To start with, Tourism has become an integral part of nations nowadays. People travel from one end to another with the means to visit other locations. While commuting remotely, the environment gets destroyed impactfully. For instance, studies say that 45% of water is polluted out of which 25 percent tourists are responsible. Natural habitats are becoming extinct due to enormous plastic consumption. Additionally, because of excessive tourist visits, the significance of cultural heritage and traditions is diminishing day by day.
It seems that the youths find them appealing and adapt to the external culture especially the western. What is more, the tribal who needs attention more than ever gets sidelined with zero progress and opportunity.
To combat these problems, there can be few steps taken towards nature, indigenous communities. Firstly, the provision of using recycled products and prohibit damage the natures gift diligently. Secondly, instead of funding them, employment can be arranged to promote tourism as they are also a part of their respective countries. Finally, tradional cultures and language should be fostered in the schools, colleges or by promoting Art, Folksongs.
To sum up, Although the rise of eco-tourism has immensely increased multiple issues such as devastation of ecosystem, and traditional cultures, preventive measures can be taken in order to mitigate the problems caused.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, such as, to start with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62730627306 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99475992845 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69741697417 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2777745437 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7058823529 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235782398934 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553303682645 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545518868947 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111040711918 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582314819017 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.