In most parts of the world,employers nowadays, try to gain more personal information about a person who has applied for a job in their office. But is this advantageous for the proprietor or the company at large? Many people think that it is not at all worthy to ask such questions as it is not beneficial for anyone. However, I would like to cast doubt on this notion by providing the evidences and justifications.
To embark upon, marital status is an extremely important question to ask as it pertains to the efficiency of an employee. It is due to the fact that a bachelor person has less amount of responsibilities in contrast to the married man. Thus, he is more suitable for certain jobs. To reinforce my view point I would like to give an example of one of my friend who had been interviewed for the post of Chief Security Officer in a big bank. But when the interviewer came to know that he is married, he did not select him, saying that this job profile demands late night stay and it will not be feasible for a married person to do it regularly.
Moreover, questions regarding avocations and leisure pursuits plays a significant role as it is proven globally through several studies that people who have some hobbies or interests are more active, enthusiastic and most importantly healthy. Hence, they tend to focus far better on their work than their peers. For example in defense, candidates who like to exercise and go to gym are more preferred over other aspirants simply because they are more capable of running and doing other strenuous physical activities.
To elucidate, although, it is not always necessary to judge a person right on the basis of aforementioned criteria because sometimes people can go beyond their limitations to attain their goals. We have so many examples to support this statement. Nonetheless, I still believe, it is good to take these measures into consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , employers
In most parts of the world,employers nowadays, try to gain more personal inf...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, thus, for example, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82066869301 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90250798771 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598784194529 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8852977691 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297233471007 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822914198813 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577191893076 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16229370413 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626522172358 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.