Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a common trend of employers requesting for personal details like pastime interests, marital status, etc. This is often debatable as few people are of the opinion that such data is relevant, however we also have set of people not in favor of this. In this essay, I will brief the pros and cons of both views and share my personal thought.
Companies intend to gather such personal details for particular requirements. For example, few companies like Nestle, Adidas sponsor the spouses, medical insurance, and children’s education. These details are often used to consolidate and provision the expenses of the organization. It is also used to validate the details periodically based on audit and company policies. There are also companies that go the extra mile and offer certain incentives based on the employees hobbies or interests. In such cases this is often a good initiative and the employee should not have any issues sharing the same.
In some cases, we have also noticed that the personal details provided in some occasion backfired on the employee. For example, a marital status as divorced might raise questions in some countries. These instances bring about a hold back nature in the employee to share personal information to the company’s database. It would be certainly beneficial for the organization to reveal the requirement of confidential data for the employee to feel comfortable and less exposed.
Therefore to conclude, sharing relevant details to the employers should be encouraged so as to ensure employees are also convinced in doing so. I support of this idea as I believe, we spend most of the hours in a day at workplace and should consider this as our second home.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... feel comfortable and less exposed. Therefore to conclude, sharing relevant details t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s to the employers should be encouraged so as to ensure employees are also convinced in ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10992907801 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87935619855 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549645390071 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.8340875788 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220608290019 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719059719564 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440546482563 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137422925051 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627044531273 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.