Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie

Whenever we make our resume or create a job profile on a job searching website, everyone shares few personal details, as this information gives an idea about personality.
However, Few companies asked for some extra information like, related to family and personal interests, and few people feel uncomfortable to share these sort of details with others, on the other hand, few do not have any concern about it.
As per my opinion, I would strongly advocate unwanted information should not be asked until unless a job is confirm. In this essay, I will discuss both the scenarios.
Firstly, If someone is applying for a job and yet it is not confirmed that he or she will get selected, there should be no question to share the personal details. As sometime these type of information could be misused for an instance, most of the companies do not handle the resumes of the candidates in a secure manner, and anyone can access these data easily.
So, It is senseless that asking for the unnecessary information from the employers prior to job confirmation. Moreover, there are few people who do not want to share their personal details, and sometimes they avoid to apply these type of job, which seeks private information.
On the other side of this, there are many people who do not have any issue to share any kind of details. They have their own views on it like sharing the details with company sometimes gives advantages. For an instance, nowadays companies are looking for the candidate who is socially active, as researchers have proved that those who are active in other tasks perform much better compared to other who only concentrate on work.
Therefore, Few people stand with this scenario as it gives an advantage.

As mentioned both the cases, few people believe that only work-related details should ask while applying for the job and few have opposite views.
Certainly, sharing personal details during the process of applying for a job will quite early and sometime this may lead to unfavorable situations, like most of the time their details are not dumped with a secure method.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...veryone shares few personal details, as these information gives an idea about personality. Howev...
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
... few people feel unconfortable to share these sort of details with others, on the other ha...
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...few does not have any concern about it. As per my opinion I would strongly advocat...
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'confirmed'.
Suggestion: confirmed
...is applying for a job and yet it is not confirm that he or she will get selected, there...
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid applying'.
Suggestion: avoid applying
...eir personal details, and sometime they avoid to apply these type of job, which seeks private ...
Line 6, column 270, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...companies are looking for the candidate who are socialy active, as researchers has prov...
Line 6, column 313, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'proved', 'proven'.
Suggestion: proved; proven
... are socialy active, as researchers has prove that those who are active in other task...
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...this scenario as it give an advantage. As mentioned both the cases, few people ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, kind of, sort of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88732394366 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5717091127 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52676056338 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.473580603 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.928571429 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31696778899 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116669632928 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421892884104 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144119101515 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578397349307 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.