Environmental problems such as pollution and climate change affect all the people in the world. Although global decisions are made to reduce these problems, the solutions are not effective. Why are the solutions ineffective? How can these problems be solved?
It is undeniable that environmental issues such as global warming and pollution have negative impacts on all countries and these negative consequences would affect the whole world. Even though some global solutions have been addressed to solve these problems, many people believe that they were not effective and efficient. The following essay will discuss some of the reasons why the solutions were not successful and how these issues should be resolved.
For a number of reasons, solutions that have been implemented for resolving environmental issues were considered as ineffective. Firstly, solutions were only implemented by certain countries. For example, only a few countries in the world implement carbon monoxide test for vehicles such as Canada or Australia while it should have been done in all countries. Other countries such as India and China are allowing vehicles with all conditions to commute in their streets and roads. Secondly, some countries do not provide clear regulations and laws regarding to environmental issues. For instance, in several countries, there is no fine or penalty when people throw the garbage to the river or sea. As a consequence, oceans are still polluted with waste from these countries. Though many global policies have been taken, many of them are not implemented in many countries. This is the main reason we still have increasing world temperature and pollutions.
There are some solutions that the United Nations and governments could consider to resolve these environmental issues. One of the solutions is that it must be agreed and implemented by all countries. For example, Air Conditioners and Refrigerators must not use CFC gas which is dangerous for the ozone layers. These regulations must be implemented internationally, and for countries that still use CFC must be banned and given penalties. And then, each country should have strict regulations regarding to environmental issues and the United Nations should audit each of these countries on a timely manner. By having a review from an independent party, each country is forced to implement friendly environmental practices in their area.
In conclusions, I believe that global environmental issues could be resolved, as long as all countries participate in implementing the solutions.
Comments
Tw kings Cars offers a…
Tw kings Cars offers a comprehensive portfolio of Private Hire passenger car services on a 24/7 basis, designed to meet the needs of our strong customer base. The diversity and flexibility of the services, together with our customer service means that tw kings Cars is the ideal choice for anyone looking for professional passenger car service. We can tailor services to meet any specific requirement.
Pembury Taxi Service
Tonbridge Taxi Service
Wadhurst Taxi Service
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cient. The following essay will discuss some of the reasons why the solutions were not succ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider resolving'.
Suggestion: consider resolving
...he United Nations and governments could consider to resolve these environmental issues. One of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42737430168 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03069536323 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486033519553 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5245144903 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.263157895 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235773737133 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834727037238 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621070473376 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170347690762 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907053970477 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.