In this era, education is the key concept which is to be acknowledged by everyone and everywhere. Admissions these days have been highlighted to an extend with the certain amendments as in compared to earlier times. As schools has the scenario of allowing the student not only on students merit credits but overall ability of the student. Whereas, enrollment in colleges or universities have more scrutinized format for allowing the students to be permissible to study. I totally disagree to the statement that we should allow everyone for admissions irrespective of their academic scores.
Firstly, if universities will provide permission to every student to be admitted in a certain course without any prerequisite format this will leave the society with no expertise people in their field. Furthermore this will lead the merit students with no privilege as they given their best by scoring higher than an average student. This controversy will mislead the youngsters and will make a difference to our education system.
Moreover, the concept of merit students given preference everywhere will not only make the students to improve and become more competitive. As with the evolution of technology there are certain changes those are to be considered with change in time. Therefore, we as a society need more efficient workers in near future. As for an instance if we say that the student who is PHD in English can teach students who are from science that can be next to impossible for the candidate as he or she is not qualified for that work.
To conclude, though education is mandatory for all but student pertaining merits should be taken to be on the priority list when we talk about higher education. As this is the only way to have more proficient professionals rather than having people with no knowledge or little knowledge on board stating the future of our country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ons these days have been highlighted to an extend with the certain amendments as in compa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ith no expertise people in their field. Furthermore this will lead the merit students with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'gave'?
Suggestion: gave
...erit students with no privilege as they given their best by scoring higher than an av...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to improve and become more competitive. As with the evolution of technology there ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ard stating the future of our country.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03525641026 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83802655447 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.94100371 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.214285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116765250443 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491622402516 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633257587342 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786561837618 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608734380066 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.