Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint?
There is an opinion that all people should take part in charity donations in an equal percentage of their income. I could not agree with this statement, and I will explain the reasons in this essay.
Firstly, making charity an obligatory cost for working people might meet a negative reaction and even cause a social protest. This possibly would be treated as a tax growth, which would negatively influence people’s real income levels. Raising taxes is a sensitive topic for any society and, thus, should be better avoided if not for an extremely serious reason. Secondly, in different life situations people’s willingness to share their income could change dramatically. By this we mean that a person could donate significantly above average when she or he has a strong financial situation, and entirely refuse paying in different situation. And this choice is better to be kept, as charity should not become a burden for a volunteer. And the final reason is that there are many problems with are under-supported by the governments and charity becomes an alternative program to tackle the issues. But different people could decide to support different issues, based on their attitude to a one or another problem. The charity provides an opportunity to any man to make a significant impact for the most personal problem, and to feel his or her importance this way. If charity lost the variety of options, the willingness to support would decline significantly, as not a lot of people would be motivated to support issues with are not important to them.
It is true that charity is an important program which gives a chance or help to people, who faced with a difficult situation. But this should be a voluntary action for each person. So everybody could take a personal decision on which amount to donate at each moment of life.
To conclude, charity is an important tool to tackle some social problems, which are not covered by the governments. But it is important to keep it voluntary so every person could decide which program to support and with which amount of his or her budget.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95197740113 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79583393896 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516949152542 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.860856656 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.117647059 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159698958914 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589716022588 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379709265434 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104402314253 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036471540895 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.