Films and games can be accessed at any time from mobile devices, like smartphones, tablets and laptop computers. Do the advantages of such development outweigh the disadvantages?
In today's globalized world, a lot of entertainment are located on portable devices at persons fingertips. Some claim that this phenomenon has positive aspects. The aim of this essay is justify that such benefits outweigh drawbacks.
On the one hand, nowadays, it has been easier to get the access to such entertainments as games or films for kids than it was before. Unfortunately, such development is not good for children. In the young age it is often hard to keep their attention on education, since they have laptops or phones with the Internet access. Take the case of Europe, for example. In 2017 german scientists conducted a research and revealed that schools where were allowed to bring devices inside became the worst in regions.
However, there are benefits that people are capable to find any films or games on their gadgets. It is obvious that while person is travelling by train or by plane there is no another way except waiting. So, entertainments really can help to kill some time in the occasions. Moreover, not only do devices assist to spend time, but also they suggest a good way for education. Currently, there are a lot of training games and films, which persons can find online. For instance, it was reported in The New York Times few years ago that almost half information on the Internet is about training or teaching something. Thus, people are really capable to study, using their tablet computers, laptops or smartphones.
To conclude, taking everything into account, the disadvantages of such phenomenon are real, but the benefits above outweigh the drawbacks. Our world and society have been developing extremely fast and people should use technologies effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ravelling by train or by plane there is no another way except waiting. So, enterta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, really, so, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04982206406 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79283032371 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612099644128 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6225132953 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4705882353 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226903088579 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060451134548 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460689447206 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111126507032 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378555480989 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.