Opinions differ about whether local inhabitants should be deducted more than foreign tourists. This phenomenon, in many cases, has more beneficial.
To begin with, foreign tourists pay more for tourism contributes to limiting overload for the tourism industry. If oversee travelers pay as equally as native travelers, the number of visitors is increased rapidly leading to put pressure on the ecological environment. As a result, this trend causes a polluted environment, serious deterioration of facilities, and restricts the development of tourism. Some sources are cited, in Venice (Italy), 20 million tourists in 2019 less contribute to the local economy but they causes a blockage in many tourist attractions and pressure on local people.
Another factor to consider is that the cost difference between foreign tourists and local people plays an important role in the tourism development budget. Tourist resorts could use tourism income to help visitors having an accident or restore and upgrade tourism service infrastructure. As a result, the tourist industry is more and more developed and enticed a large quantity of oversee travelers and domestic tourists. Research-base, in 2022, tourist foreign coming to the EU must pay an extra 7EUR to contribute to the budget which paid for maintenance infrastructure in tourist destinations.
In conclusion, cultural and historical attractions will be preserved for a long time with additional revenue from foreign visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...m industry. If oversee travelers pay as equally as native travelers, the number of visitor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 470, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enice Italy, 20 million tourists in 2019 less contribute to the local economy but...
^^
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...ontribute to the local economy but they causes a blockage in many tourist attractions ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in conclusion, as a result, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58928571429 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06268221032 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616071428571 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.414509868 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.818181818 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269238852759 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100134925433 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601510132674 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174913769903 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444917591996 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.