There has been much discussion revolving around the issue of whether zoos should survive in the 21st century. Although zoos might be beneficial to some extent, they would replace by other methods of animal conservation.
Initially, animals lose their hunting ability when held in captivity. In zoos, animals are fed, bathed, and lived by staff so that they do not need to search for food and hunt for prey. Consequently, animals gradually lost the animal's ability to run fast, hunting, and survival characteristics. As a result, animals in zoos could not serve if they were released into the natural environment. I shall make reference to 2019, a tiger in Botanical Garden, a park in Hanoi city, was released back into the wild under the supervision of researchers in 2 months. Therefore, this tiger can not catch the bait by itself because it runs at a much lower speed than the tiger, with an average running speed (49-65km/h), and has no hunting skills.
Admittedly, zoos educate people to respect wild animals. However, when animals are imprisoned in an iron cage, people have no scare them so zoos do not teach people to respect animals. For example, last 2 years, I visited zoos with my family and saw some people throwing rocks at elephants to get their attention. That shows that they are hurting the elephant without any respect.
In conclusion, zoos should be replaced with wildlife sanctuaries to ensure habitat for animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...onsequently, animals gradually lost the animals ability to run fast, hunting, and survi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97095435685 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65441493193 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639004149378 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8081954981 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1538461538 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181940415826 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622361987259 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317878961353 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108673553864 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106652606128 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.