Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destructions of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Trees are the integral part of our lives. It has been observed that more and more trees are being cutting down that, in future, leads to end of this world. I completely associate with this thought. Ideas articulated further in this discourse will support my stand and at the same time highlight certain contradictory views that others in the society might possibly have.
The topmost reason for my belief is global warming. Excessive deforestation defiantly has many repercussions and one of them is this. Weather change is one of the example what we are facing right now. Normally, summer starts from April but this year it started from March itself. This can be a wakeup call for all us otherwise we will lose our globe.
Another reason for me to uphold this view is forest facilitates us with oxygen. Trees omit oxygen during photosynthesis process and takes cardan dioxide, which is toxic for human if the quantity of it exceed a particular limit. Therefore, we, humans, are dependent on forest for giving us fresh oxygen that is necessity of anyone. To cite an example, the Amazon Rain forest produces 20% of O2 that is the maximum amount of O2provider.
Paradoxically, there are individuals in the society who are of the up-hold that Cutting of trees is not being considered as deadly activity. One of the plausible reasons for this view is increasing number of planting new plants. They believe that to cover up the deforestation activities, government is also encouraging afforestation, in which government is planting new plants as well as taking care of them. This estimation, perhaps, stems from the fact that accommodation for people. Because of the rapid increase in population, there is a shortage for the land to live on. To provide shelters to people, cutting of forest is mandatory, that will help to build house for houseless folks.
In conclusion, notstandingwith contradiction, I am of the firm opinion that big trees cannot be replaced by the small plants as small plants would take many years to give benefits that older trees are giving at present.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'might', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: might; possibly
...ictory views that others in the society might possibly have The topmost reason for my belie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'might'.
Suggestion: might
...ictory views that others in the society might possibly have The topmost reason for my belie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...ke up call for all us otherwise we will lost our globe Another reason for me to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all us otherwise we will lost our globe Another reason for me to uphold this vie...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat is the maximum amount of O2 provider Paradoxically there are individuals in t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e individuals in the society who are of the uphold that Cutting of trees is not being cons...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81534090909 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70014772084 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 352.0 20.2975951904 1734% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1695.0 106.682146367 1589% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 352.0 20.7667163134 1695% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 61.0 7.06120827912 864% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0774511154544 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774511154544 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0405713925905 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368018608659 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 177.3 13.0946893788 1354% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -277.34 50.2224549098 -552% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 139.4 11.3001002004 1234% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.16 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.73 8.58950901804 288% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 142.8 10.1190380762 1411% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 25.0 10.7795591182 232% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.