In many countries, the government prohibits underage children from getting full-time jobs. Is it agood thing or bad thing?

Essay topics:

In many countries, the government prohibits underage children from getting full-time jobs. Is it a
good thing or bad thing?

Child labour has become one of the concerning issues for many governments all over the world, hence stopping children from obtaining permanent job is the first initiative by various nations. However, I believe this can be considered as a positive development, owing to this, offspring can not only spend their childhood with friends and family but also educate appropriately before joining any type of job.

To commence with, acquiring a full-time work since early age affects the education of a child, which should be the first priority. In other words, children are the next generation of our country; if they could not furnished with proper education, whole country will suffer with bad conditions. Otherwise, increment in illiteracy rate leads to mor crime to earn money. To cite an example, in Kerala, the literacy rate is 98%, hence since then there are minimal crime cases and children and the society both can live their quality of life. Therefore, educating next generation might bestow the nation with brighter future.

Furthermore, instead of enjoying childhood with family and friends, children are beginning to make money. Because of this, pupils are ruining their life as well as health. Simply put, sometimes to get money, they choose any type of work including labour job, which has repercussions on their health. Moreover, mostly jobs not only gives depression and stress to a child but also delays their development due to dangerous working conditions and from taking on physical tasks, which exceed their capacities. For example, they are exposed to harmful chemicals, leading to other serious health and mental illness later in their lives. Thus, this should be prohibited by the authorities, as it is beneficial of children.

To conclude, child labour is serious threat to the society’s growth. By removing this, government saves the nation as well as the young generation.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'furnish'
Suggestion: furnish
...ation of our country; if they could not furnished with proper education, whole country wi...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25901639344 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7053571427 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8020972338 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.933333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101389493961 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329794091166 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353017300454 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569736487067 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151649612801 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.