Many people are spending a lot of money on their weddings. Do you think this is a good thing?
The perception of measuring happiness is different from person to person. The new trend of celebrating various occasions, such as weddings extravagantly in our society is gaining momentum. This essay evaluates my wholehearted agreement for such party inflation.
To commence with, certain occasions are priceless and rare as well as they convey a special meaning to the life. Ergo, they believe that it is essential to make them worthwhile forever. By spending huge sum of money on wedding, and inviting family members, relatives, and friends to this event, they feel happy and satisfied. Such grand celebration are their memories that they treasure always. To cite an example, organising destination wedding would give upliftment to their status as well as it becomes nostalgic memories of everyone’s life. Therefore, it is worth to celebrate such events lavishly.
Furthermore, such grand events furnish a livelihood to many restaurant, organiser, event manager, fashion outlet and so on. In other words, a person, who wants such grand wedding, will definitely hire event manager to organise their wedding sans any trouble. Owing to this, the business firms employ people and run their families. To quote an example, the popularity of wedding dresses are burgeoning everywhere. Due to that, the fashion designers have to work from down to dusk and employ new employees, too. Thus, this trend creates the job opportunities for many.
To conclude, although, others are for or against of such weddings, one should continue to spend on weddings as long as it does not pinch him financially. Hence, they get a chance not only to socialize with their relatives but also to showcase their financial status to others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun restaurant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many restaurants'.
Suggestion: many restaurants
...ch grand events furnish a livelihood to many restaurant, organiser, event manager, fashion outl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29927007299 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85547034765 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6104192915 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4117647059 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135690321594 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400678648016 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454082664204 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775899467284 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318181748961 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.