In future, natural resource such as coal and oil will be used up. How can we reduce their depletion. What are the alternative sources of energy available?
This truth is universally acknowledged fact that there is a drastic change in each and every field just due to the rapid advancement in technology. The usage of natural resources will be boomed up to great extent if this trend will be continued in future. However, we can decline it by researching other energy sources. These points of view will be discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs.
It has always been regarded that the utilization of natural resources can decline by taking various steps. For instance, public transport, according to the recent survey of the Times of Japan, the consumption of petrol and Diesel is slumped by providing efficient public transport. So, most of the individuals use buses, trains, street cars to reach at their destination. In addition, people should not use such resource if they have other choice to complete their work. Therefore, it is crystallized that we can reduce their consumption to some extent by following aforesaid measures.
However, there are another numerous sources of energy available for people such as, solar energy, wind power, Bio-gas and so on. To paraphrase, we can use the water to produce electricity rather than coal. Inclusively, government should impose some strict rules for three R' vial to energy conservation such as reduce use, recycle and re use. What is more, Hydrogen fuel cell technology is the latest invention in this contemporary era.
Laconically, it is certainly true that government should come forward and provide support to researcher so that they can find some more reliable source in a foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... extent if this trend will be continued in future. However, we can decline it by research...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectricity rather than coal. Inclusively, government should impose some strict rul...
^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eliable source in a foreseeable future.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22093023256 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86416275368 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635658914729 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5268307381 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374284764288 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106200237869 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067311734605 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184428456518 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06303433977 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.