Since the last two decades or so, life has become materialistic and no one seems to have a minute for themselves too. As a result, the majority of the citizens in any country are failing to have a good relationship with their neighbours. This could seriously affect the social life and neighbours are like second family members. In the past situation used to be different and our older generation used to maintain a healthy relationship with people who are living in the next door.
There could be many reasons why most of them have less contact with neighbours. Firstly, globalization has brought in more and more jobs and the job market has been increasing rapidly. Because of this, people either forced or more inclined to find new jobs in other countries. In a short period of time, it is hard to maintain a healthy relationship with another culture citizens. Secondly, the local communities might not have good places to meet up or to organize an event. Consequently, we do not speak to the people in our neighbourhood so much.
I think there are numerous ways to overcome this issue. Different country government has to join hands in order to exchange the culture and they have to educate the people about the importance of having a social life. On top this, local authorities should build communal areas such as pars for children’s, walking tracks, sports clubs and functional halls. This way it would be easy to stay in touch with our neighbourhood.
To conclude, neighbours do play a vital role in our daily lifestyle and there are the first points of contact in an emergency. So, it is essential for anyone to maintain good contact and above solutions might help in providing a good neighbourhood to anyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...new jobs in other countries. In a short period of time, it is hard to maintain a healthy relat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as to, i think, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83783783784 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8388029247 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577702702703 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0811402709 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293828158263 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085044918894 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570690055162 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161489236024 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523796431548 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.