In recent years, genetic engineering has developed a lot for humans, animals, and plants. Some people believe these developments are necessary, while others regard them as dangerous and advocate a return to more traditional methods. Discuss both points of

Essay topics:

In recent years, genetic engineering has developed a lot for humans, animals, and plants. Some people believe these developments are necessary, while others regard them as dangerous and advocate a return to more traditional methods. Discuss both points of your view and give your own opinion.

genetic modification has raised many debates these days. A group of people believes that in the modern world modern techniques such as genetic engineering is crucial, however, others think that altering genes is interfering with nature and might be harmful to human health. In my point of view, acquiring the knowledge of genetic engineering can be a plus and I agree with the first group.

On the one hand, genetic modification is necessary for the recent generation. Overpopulation and the threat of food shortage or malnutrition make scientists work on an alternative option for producing more food or more resistant crops by altering their genes. In fact, genetic engineering proved a solution to protect the crops without pesticides or insecticide usage which are harmful to human health as well. For instance, In Bangladesh, genetically modified eggplants help peasants to harvest their crops much more than earlier years. In my perspective, using genetic engineering is beneficial for human these days especially using it in medicine and plant fertility.

On the other hand, some people believe that the conventional method of developing food is much safer. they think interfering in natural processes of food production by genetic modification could be harmful and its consequences would influence mankind health dramatically. Environmental degradation, mutation are some examples of the result of altering the genes of plant or animals. So they are in favor of organic food and prefer to consume less genetically modified food because they consider such these foods are healthier.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides about the impacts of GMO on human health, I profoundly believe that we should enjoy the scientific discoveries and trust it because even organic foods could be dangerous by poisoning human or in some regions it might cause malnutrition.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Genetic
genetic modification has raised many debates th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ethod of developing food is much safer. they think interfering in natural processes ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in fact, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41946308725 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98493469653 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563758389262 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4172825407 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224786287483 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820457682372 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424191062046 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12335559364 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268063328691 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.