Government money should be used to support children in school for sports rather than to support professional sports and arts that perform for general public
To what extent you agree or disagree?
It is highly debated that Government funds should be allocated for sports and art activity at school level or for the professional level, who represent their country in several international platform. I agree that there is a need of a day to encourage at professional level rather than school level, as professionals represent the nation and shall bring name and fame after winning to the country.
At school level, sports and cultural trainings are usually basic and does not require high end equipment and resources to get trained, hence in those cases the funding can be taken care by their parents and institutions together to cater to the needs at initial stage. In addition, during early childhood days the visions of the kids are not clear, and down the line there is a high probability of change in path or vision. In such case all the resource and efforts put in those training may go in vain. Hence Government funds should be restricted at higher level.
Today, we come across several cultural and sporting events which are conducted at international level that are highly competitive. Therefore, there is a need of Government funds to get prepared for such international standards. Professionals have to practice rigorously dedicating their time and energy to win in those events. For example, Mr Rahil an Indian athlete, was put under 15 months rigorous training and as a result he won a Gold medal in 2017 Olympic in 100 Meter running. During those 15 months Government funds were supporting him to cater to his needs. Hence its imperative to consider the professional funding rather than on school children.
To summarize, I believe that there is extreme need to allocate funds to professionals than school children considering the platform and the country they represent. However, arts and sports at school level should not be neglected by school authorities, they must fill the gap from their own sources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the kids are not clear, and down the line there is a high probability of chan...
^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...fforts put in training, may go in vain. Hence Government funds should be restricted a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unds were supporting him to cater to his needs. Hence its imperative to consider ...
^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... supporting him to cater to his needs. Hence its imperative to consider the professi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...present. However, sports at school level should not be neglected by school author...
^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st fill the gap from their own sources.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, may, so, therefore, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05769230769 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84083587258 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9287571983 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241581258538 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087498817911 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672427193289 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165299223428 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795538208489 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.