Government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is crucial for the authority to support much budget in science learning rather than others to enhance the country. I would firmly oppose this view because scientific education is extremely necessary to the sustainable development of the nation.
On the one hand, The most fundamental reason is that science plays an essential role in the inexorable improvement of intellect. On the individual level, many an adolescent is inclined to lean towards learning science subject because they can have a good college qualification after graduating. As a result, they can have well-paid jobs, such as doctors, scientists, let alone architects. Nevertheless, should they just focus on science subjects, they are not able to foster those who have the aesthetic qualities of arts. Therefore, this could have an adverse bearing on the number of students, such as losing their interest to learn due to the difficulty of subjects, such as math, physic, let alone chemistry.
On the other hand, the rationale is that other subjects such as art, English. It appears that the word english may be a proper noun in this context. Consider capitalizing the word.
show examples
would help them to nurture their creativity, which could lead to analytical ability’s development. As a result, many students can meet lots of companies’ needs so that we can degrade the unemployment rate. For instance, the public can have less social chaos. Another valid reason is that they can wind down after studying science subjects. As a result, we can boost their productivity when we study difficult subjects.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that although may practical subject help to develop their country, the government should encourage students to balance their education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Show
...t. Consider capitalizing the word. show examples would help them to nurture t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a result, many students can meet lots of companies’ needs so that we can degrade ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30604982206 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87738650486 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597864768683 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4922327461 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124684082985 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401050277059 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495456130763 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818943475301 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499492600356 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.