government should pay for the course fees for everyone who wants to study at the university .to whAT extent do you agree or disagree.
it is irrefutable that government provides funds for university students in the form of scholarship, that is very beneficial for not only students but for the economy as well. On the contrary, it is detrimental in other ways and thus, I would consider it to be both a positive as well as a negative development. In the following paragraphs, I will argue both sides.
Education plays an important role in the development of an economy. Every government-sponsored various scholarship schemes to enhance the enrollment of students in the universities. It is a welcome step as it fulfills the dream of many poor students who give up the idea of pursuing higher education due to financial constraints. On the other hand, parents need not worry about arranging funds for their child's higher studies. They can utilize their savings to increase their standard of living.
Despite the benefits, I believe that the adverse repercussions of providing free education to university students cannot be ignored. The government has to bear the whole cost which eventually enhances the taxes. Ultimately, the people of the country have to pay more out of their income to increase the revenue of the government. Another reason for disagreement is students sometimes do not realize they need to concentrate more on their studies if they are getting it for free rather losing interest in studies. Many students give up their higher education and start doing jobs to earn their livelihood. Hence, it will affect badly the government's initiative to enhance the number of students getting a higher education.
In Summary, I would like to reiterate that the government should provide free education to needy students, which definitely helps in improving levels of education in the country. But this initiative suffers from various disadvantages. However, the government can adopt such methods of providing free education that its advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is irrefutable that government provides...
^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...would consider it to be both a positive as well as a negative development. In the followin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g paragraphs, I will argue both sides. Education plays an important role in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to increase their standard of living. Despite the benefits, I believe that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... students getting a higher education. In Summary, I would like to reiterate th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, as to, in summary, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26366559486 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09518226026 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540192926045 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6122690992 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2941176471 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154278383514 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436451065076 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552361544536 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943449981092 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428048125604 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.