Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
People are calling into question the allocation of budget by government on railways over the roads. While some individuals believe that government should spend money on railways, others dismiss them as they think roads are the main and the most important one. Admittedly, I completely agree that government should be more focused on railways and spend money on railways for a number of compelling reasons which will be elaborated.
To begin with, nowadays railways consider as one of the safest ways of transportation. That is, the more technology enhanced, the more trains are being safer. In other words, being more automatic and less human controlled, trains are getting safer. Due to the fact that based on the recent research, 85 percent of accident are because of the human fault. Therefore, were to government allot the budget for railways and expand the network, the benefits accruing from this would be for society, as people would have a safer way of transportation.
Yet another compelling argument is that thanks to the technology, the trains, nowadays, are become much more faster thank any vehicles on the roads. That being said, if people wanted to travel from one location to another, travelling via railways could save them a lot of time. Moreover, one train can easily transport thousands of people while with one bus, for example, maximum of 50 individuals can be transport. Thus, by spend more budget on railways not only government can help ones with their time but also more individuals can be transported at the same time.
In sum up, I completely agree that government must allot more budget for railways rather than roads. That is mainly because by using railways government can lay the foundation for building a better and safer country and address some controversial concerns of the society including but not limited to safety and time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
..., the trains, nowadays, are become much more faster thank any vehicles on the roads. That b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06818181818 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6934572595 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542207792208 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9676950879 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204240203282 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077674506822 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722784241615 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143532184413 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764977809041 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.