A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
A big number of people thought that animals have equal rights with human and they should dial with animals by good way, while there are many people believe that humans should use to applying there needs such as eating, carrying things and scientific researches.
The first notion is the animals have rights to live and the human slaves the animals. The animals right organizations calls the human to stop exploits animals and demand countries governments to make laws to protect animals and punish everyone harm the animals .Also the organizations works to build places to take care the animals that had no one to take care them and this places provided the animals food and medical care.
On the other hand, there are many people have the point of view says the animal must using in satisfying human needs such as food, the human shuttled some kinds of animals to eat it`s meats and use their skins in industrial leathers. The humans can also use the animals in the past in agricultures works and provide the lands with its needs from water and he can use it in scientific experiments to make drugs to fighting the diseases.
In conclusion, I agree with use the animals to satisfy the human needs and in the same time the human should respect its rights in live.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...als and punish everyone harm the animals .Also the organizations works to build pl...
^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...s and punish everyone harm the animals .Also the organizations works to build places...
^^^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s and punish everyone harm the animals .Also the organizations works to build places...
^^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... care them and this places provided the animals food and medical care. On the other ha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7130044843 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30105587309 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 176.041082164 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.8733974204 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.166666667 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1666666667 20.7667163134 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401429208599 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217332998344 0.084324248473 258% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851516817516 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26141578069 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478129722811 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 11.3001002004 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 78.4519038076 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.