A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons from your own experience and examples where relevan
People are calling into challenge the exploitation of animals by individuals. While some advocate the idea that animals prove beneficial for ecosystem and their right is in equal measure with humans, others dismiss the idea because they think can satisfy numerous requirements such as research and consumption. Both sides of the argument present rational ideas, which will be elaborated.
One the one hand, the supporters of animals’ rights put forward some compelling reasons to justify their point of view. To begin with, animal is an integral part of the nature and have similar biological complexity feeling like mankind. It has been shown, having experimented on laboratories, they feel the same amount of suffering and loss as humans do. Therefore, it would be unfair for humankind to abuse them. Moreover, humans are not compelled to kill animals so as to meet their needs of food. In fact, many people choose a vegetarian diet for moral or health reasons. From their perspective, a healthy diet is possible without eating animals’ meat. Green vegetables and fruit also provides people with all the nutrients and vitamins that they need, and in turn, will reduce the risk of health problems like contagion risk.
On the other hand, the opponents assert that the benefits accruing from utilization of animals are by no means negligible. The most compelling argument justifying their assertion is that animals experimenting helps to advance medical and scientific knowledge. In other words, researches can lay the groundwork for finding new treatments and save mankind' lives. Furthermore, the people who are accustomed to consume meats argue that animals are below humans in the food chain and it absolutely is acceptable for us to slay them for our nutritional needs. From their point of view, eating vegetables with poor nutritional values instead of meat is a threat to humans’ health.
To conclude, logical points on both sides; although some people argue killing animals for research and food is necessary, I am of the opinion that eliminating animals is completely unethical work and should be banned by governments.
- A close friend is coming to visit you he she has asked you for advice for things to do in your hometown and the surrounding area Write a letter to your friend In your letter ask more details about your friend s plans Suggest some places to visit and thing74
- Obesity is a serious problem in many countries, especially in rich countries. Discuss ways to solve the problem. Provide specific reasons and examples to support your answer.84
- Culture and traditions change from generation to generation Why does this happen What can be done to change it92
- Some people believe that despite widespread the social media and internet, the traditional newspaper hold the most vital position in new readers. It appears to me, this idea, nowadays, is rather absurd for some major reasons which will be discussed in det67
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health caresystem in an effort to deal with the health issues involved. Some people think that thebest way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons inthe s73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO
Message: Use simply 'to'
...umans are not compelled to kill animals so as to meet their needs of food. In fact, many...
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to consuming'.
Suggestion: accustomed to consuming
... lives. Furthermore, the people who are accustomed to consume meats argue that animals are below huma...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29239766082 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84047434735 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7844881986 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.470588235 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399838133438 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11089729411 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635698086873 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239899195959 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174204785075 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.