Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Over the past few years, there is a great competition to host international sporting events. These events, typically, are held every three or four years and a large number of people travel across the world to support their team during the event. While a sizable number of people believe that the price involved in hosting such events is worthwhile, but others claim that it could have dire consequences and perhaps not every country should try and stage international sporting events.

There are some arguments in favour of hosting international sporting events. Firstly, the host country is in the limelight in the world and can enhance their image, and in turn benefit from the potential tourism industry. Mega sports events attract a vast number foreign visitors, which promotes retail trade and boost the economy. For instance, in the Football world cup event that was held in 2018, tourists who were coming to the host country spent a sizable amount of their money on accommodation, travel, entertainment and foods, which means that it has generated more revenue for the local businesses and for the government through taxes. Secondly, people who live in the host country that are influenced by highly publicized events are more likely to take part in sport on a regular basis. Therefore, this happen is beneficial for both society and individuals. Furthermore, since the host country need to modern and equipped sport facilities, it is a big chance to renovate infrastructure and build the arenas.

On the other hand, the major argument against hosting international sporting events is financial. Hosting events like the World Cup may result in the country incurring huge debts. Indeed, the money spent on state-of-the-art stadiums and arenas would be better spent on education programs, welfare and health services. In addition, if the event is not well organized are more likely to the image of the host nation would be tarnished.

To sum up, it is an honour for a country holding an international sporting event and would have its own positive and negative sides. In my personal opinion, I believe that the benefits of hosting the event are greater than the drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... are held every three or four years and a large number of people travel across the world to suppo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...es and perhaps not every country should try and stage international sporting events. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the host nation would be tarnished. To sum up, it is an honour for a country...
^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... own positive and negative sides. In my personal opinion, I believe that the benefits of hosting...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10055865922 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74368940085 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5830718415 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417239471804 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142559314555 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801228669776 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269108532324 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453426815717 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.