Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and your opinion.
Organizing high-profile athletic events is considered to be advantageous by an overwhelming majority of people. Even though some individuals do not see eye to eye with this concept, i firmly believe that it will benefit both society and country economically.
Some people support the idea of hosting these mega events simply because they acknowledge their country will become a tourist attraction. When the sports lovers visit the country to enjoy games then they will not only purchase tickets of matches but also pay their bills of hotels which in turn benefit the local economy of that particular region. For example, 2010 Olympics held in London drew in thousands of sports’ fans who invested big chunk of money to London; resultantly, it bolsters the country’s economical condition by 20%. Besides, for hosting mega events, large proportion of manpower is required who can arrange each and everything smoothly. This assists unemployed people to get job by being part of these occasions. Thus, these people are in favour of this phenomenon as it helps to accelerate the economy and employment rate.
Meanwhile, there are some masses who are in disharmony with this assertion. They are convinced that these high-profile sports events will not only impose security threats but also causes environmental distortion. From the starting of these grand functions to the end, the security of the nation is on stake, especially from opponents and terrorist. The host country has to deploy military force, around the clock investing astronomical amount of finance. However, these individuals assert that these funds could be better utilized for ameliorating the other aspects of their states such as infrastructure, education and poverty-eradication strategic. Moreover, the people visiting to see such events use the things and throw wherever they want because they do not have feeling of ourselves towards that country which in turn degrade the natural beauty of that particular region. In short, taking these risks into account, some mortals strongly oppose this concept.
Conclusively, despite the fact that organizing mega sports events bring some problems, i firmly regard it as a positive move.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, moreover, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42028985507 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90612922313 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597101449275 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7352691448 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194492032124 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587608899226 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448280970436 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124626652852 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157450490727 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.