Some people think that environmental problems can be solved by individuals while others think that individual alone cannot solve these environmental issues unless government take some action.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Tackling the environmental issues by individuals is feasible for some mortals. However, others opine that people solely cannot do anything without the involvement of government. I personally believe that not only individuals’ support is in demand but also responsiveness of regime is necessary to combat the environmental distortion.
It is easy to comprehend why some people consider that only individuals are able to curb this environmental havoc. They believe that by limiting the use of private vehicles, environmental pollution can be controlled because the toxic fumes emitted by these vehicles contribute astronomical proportion in causing pollution. Instead, they should practice carpooling. For example, in Delhi, state of India, the air contamination has been reduced by 20% due to reduction in the usage of personal vehicles. Moreover, by changing the throwaway lifestyle, people can preserve the natural planet. Instead of throw the garbage in open space, they should follow the 3R principles that are reduce, reuse and recycle. In short, in this way, people can bring the environmental distortion on halt.
Meanwhile, there are some masses who acknowledge that without exercising national or international policies, individuals cannot curb such environmental devastation. As industries release exhaust in large amount which ends up in environmental pollution, state authorities should impose stringent rules on the emission of industrial units. For example, they can impose heavy tax on the utilization of fossil fuels which will discourage the industries to use them. Additionally, regime has the ability to control the individuals who do logging out of trees. They should either penalize heavy amount of money or put them behind bars. Why to cut down trees when they not only saves earth but also provides useful products to people. Thus, owing to these reasons, governments’ assistance is required.
Conclusively, despite the fact that environmental devastation can be controlled at individual’s level, I strongly believe that collaborative efforts of both individuals and regime are required to put a stop to environmental concerns.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...hould follow the 3R principles that are reduce, reuse and recycle. In short, in this w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70987654321 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33023976246 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.199478626 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.777777778 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252542455675 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773659277751 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740853728931 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172065198388 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416782518709 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.