In many countries government spend a lot of money in improving internet access. Why is it happening? Do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
Ameliorating the internet infrastructure by allotting astronomical proportion of national budget is common in many nations, especially developed countries. Various causative factors are being held responsible for this trend. Although it seems an advantageous approach, I strongly hold a belief that it is not judicious decision to spend such a huge amount of public funds on availing internet access.
It is easy to comprehend why this investment is favored by regime of wealthier nations. The preponderant reason is that the availability of online network not only proves beneficial for individuals but also assists in the smooth functioning of the governments’ official work. If every citizen whether he is working or non-working has the access of web, he would be updated with the vast information such as current political scenario, weather updates and even he will be acquainted with his rights; consequently, accessibility of the internet connection provides assistance to broaden the horizon of people. Besides, state incumbents give preference to keep the records of official work online, replacing the manual work which results in efficient management of the records. Thus, investing on the development of internet facility is acknowledged to be beneficial approach.
Despite these benefits, I do not see eye to eye with this proposal. There are many other pressing issues such as poverty, educational sector, health care facilities and employment which require immediate attention of authorities. Government needs to assign budget on providing the basic amenities to the underprivileged people in order to bolster the standard of the country. Who wants to access internet when he is dying because of scarcity of food?
Conclusively, despite the fact that investment of public grant for the improvement in the network connection is regarded as a boon in terms of spreading awareness and smooth execution of work, I firmly consider it as a squander of public money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...cution of work, I firmly consider it as a squander of public money.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49673202614 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20739938656 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6216941272 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.384615385 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145718046153 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437773010036 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242816789615 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806750361863 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128588992373 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.