Multinational companies are becoming increasingly common in developing countries. What are advantages and disadvantages of this?
Growing dominance of transcontinental business units in impoverished nations is a common trend these days. Various notable merits and demerits are associated with this trend, which are elaborated in subsequent paragraphs.
It is easy to comprehend why this phenomenon is considered to be advantageous. The preponderant reason is that it not only brings employment but also improves the economy of the poverty-stricken country. If multinational companies set-up their footsteps in developing countries, these firms definitely recruit personnel who can work over there; consequently, unemployed youth will get chance to work and the employment rate would drop significantly. Besides, for operating in necessitous realms, these foreign companies have to take license from the government of recipient nation and in return they pay an astronomical proportion of capital in the form of tax; resultantly, the economy of unprivileged nation fosters.
Despite these benefits, there are some surprising disadvantages of transnational firms. The inclination of global companies not only causes the downsizing of domestic market but also environment distortion. The local merchandise is unable to compete with international organizations because they provide better product in terms of quality, quantity and price. Who wants to purchase local average quality item when one has the option to avail the international branded product at affordable price? Moreover, being operating in developing country, they utilize natural resources of that particular country. After using natural resources, they throw the garbage in open which end up with polluting the environment. For example, Ludhiana, a state of Punjab, is known as industrial hub because an overwhelming majority of the industries are established here, and the environmental devastation is on its peak point.
Conclusively, despite the fact multinational firms are beneficial from employment and economic perspective, it has long-lasting damaging effect on domestic trade and atmosphere.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92881355932 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37368017114 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657627118644 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7038909717 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.928571429 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125390281969 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350232581848 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332208658949 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651254832222 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288888091658 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.