I disagree with the statement that if an individual faces health issues, he should be held responsible for it. There are certain situations where medical facilities should be available to the citizens on an equal platform regardless of their financial status. The ensuing paragraphs will support my view point.
Catastrophic diseases like cancer and tumors are difficult to control. While we can take care of our general health by following a healthy life style and regular exercise, it is highly unlikely that conditions where one suffers with deadly diseases can be detected easily. As per a survey conducted by WHO, 70% cases of cancer are detected at stage 3 and the condition is severe. If the patient is lucky enough to realize the symptoms at an early stage, then, they can be saved. Therefore, it is difficult to blame the individual for developing certain health conditions.
Another scenario where it is unfair to hold a person accountable is in the wake of natural calamities. They are uncalled disasters which can injure or result in untimely death of public. No one expects such calamities and are unprepared for such situation. For instance, the leak of methane gas on 3rd December in Bhopal, India took hundreds and thousands of lives, till today the generations following the calamity have been suffering with skin, eyes and lung diseases. Hence, it would be unethical to deprive the victims of medical services and proper treatment.
To conclude, while people can surely take care of their general health, it is impossible to predict certain diseases and natural calamities. Therefore, it is important to provide health care to everyone disregarding their income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...ed easily. As per a survey conducted by WHO, 70% cases of cancer are detected at st...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17518248175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76301236085 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620437956204 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8357991887 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30375501291 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874762732328 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784524741416 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172148039088 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487781120508 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.