Housing shortage in big cities can cause severe social consequences. Some people think only government action can solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that unavailability of living space in congested metropolitan can lead to unprecedented repercussions. I completely agree with the statement that its government responsibility to mitigate these problems.
Firstly, with increase in population, people are forced to live in crowded areas subsidizing the standard of living. In other words, quality of life decrease substantially by this phenomena. For example, inhibitors face security issues as with clogged streets crime rate increases. This cannot be controlled by individuals or society so authorities have to take action, such as increase in forced units and installation of surveillance cameras, to overcome this problem. Additionally, increase in garbage production rate and air pollution caused by traffic is seen on these places leading to deteriorating environmental condition. Again here, government ought to provide a systematic disposal system to restrict carbon emission.
Secondly, to evade the situation, families prefer to live on suburbs, away from the main cities. This not only deprives them of basic facilities such as Hospitals, which mostly are situated in center of cities, but also generate mobilization problems. For instance, on an average, it takes approximately one hour for commuters to reach the workplace from outskirts of city for job. Communities cannot provide such facilities because of limited resources and government have to indulge to construct amenities for families living on far side according to the requirements. Furthermore, efficient traffic system need to be established to resolve travel issue. For example, London is expanding exponentially and government has provided underground railway called tube to facilitate citizens.
In conclusion, although societal problems generate in populated cities, effective government policies and steps can help solve these problems for the betterment of society and increase in life standard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | shivangi patel | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-30 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
- People think that it is more important to plant trees in towns and cities than to build more houses. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Nowadays people have a lot of stress Why is that How to reduce it 57
- Some people think that rest and sleep are the best methods to relax while others think that it can be done by involving in some activities like sports. Do you agree or disagree and give your view? 89
- People are living in a ‘throwaway society’, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to? 78
- Scientists predict that in future cars will be driven by computers. What is the reason behind this? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ality of life decrease substantially by this phenomena. For example, inhibitors face...
^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'streets'' or 'street's'?
Suggestion: streets'; street's
...rs face security issues as with clogged streets crime rate increases. This cannot be co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86267605634 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24423060766 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651408450704 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8112211987 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138493002565 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400017096803 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361535378835 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916821363566 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327092427529 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.