How malls replace local shops, explain advantages and disadvantages of both with an example.
In recent years, many local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres to do their shopping.
Reason behind this is simple. Customer prefer shopping malls because that is one stop destination for all their needs. They do have options ranging from cinemas, food and exclusive collection of branded cloths. Malls also have options of creche so that married couple can leave their children and carry on with their tasks. Also, malls have massaging chairs and other needed things for elderly people to keep them engaged. Since most of the current generation have either bike or car, mall provide free parking for the customers. In almost all malls, we can find a grocery stores and people purchase before they leave the mall.
As result of this, many local shops have closed. It is not a good sign because the economy of mid-range families has been affected. To overcome this, owners of local shops should come up with some solution to enhance them and attract more customers to their side. They can book nearby place for parking and provide free parking to its customer. Additionally, they can run offers during festival which would pull a good number of customers.
Eventhough local shops provide discounts and come up with new strategy, it is almost impossible to pull lost customers back into their business. People will tend to spend something more in malls to get the branded cloths and accessories, rather than getting it cheaper in local shops. Also, vast collections of branded materials make mall almost impossible to replace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...make mall almost impossible to replace.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11196911197 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33322862459 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2927038697 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.75 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 7.06120827912 7% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120126218039 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400074623832 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325390642236 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754454650324 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360741189082 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.