Human activity has damaged the environment all around the world. Some people think that humans cannot stop damaging the planet where as other believe that we can alter our behaviour and prevent future damage. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Human activity puts a highly negative strain on our planet. Some are of the opinion that there is no way to stop it, while others assume that future damage could be minimized and human’s responsibility to implement certain damage preventive measures. In this essay, I will consider both sides of the argument and then give my own opinion on the matter.
On the one side are those, who are sure that nothing can be done with harmful human activities such as resource extraction, working plants and factories, refineries, etc. This is because humans have got constant demand for supplies and their production inevitably damages the environment. In addition, all our attempts to somehow reduce our need for resources are futile and do not bring any significant change in the ecological situation in terms of the pollution or the decline in mining. To illustrate, despite all the efforts only 13% of the global energy supply is covered by the alternative sources of energy.
Nevertheless, their opponents believe that humans should not stop the attempts of tackling the issue as there are feasible measures, which can be taken in order to prevent further damage. Thus, all the environmental initiatives should be implemented on governmental level as only global cooperation is capable of significantly improving the situation. For example, the global manufactures and authorities should allocate funds to the environment-friendly production and cost-effective methods of using renewable resources.
In conclusion, both sides have their merits. On balance, however, I believe that human-beings have to do everything to tackle ecological issues at any cost because it is our responsibility to save the planet for the future generations.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e methods of using renewable resources. In conclusion, both sides have their mer...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38827838828 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15125205479 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1742665366 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303542014223 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101275577375 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764186672895 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183689121472 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107331358935 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e methods of using renewable resources. In conclusion, both sides have their mer...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38827838828 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15125205479 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1742665366 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303542014223 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101275577375 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764186672895 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183689121472 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107331358935 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.