Nowadays it is known that wildlife is in danger because of the irresponsible control over human activity. Some groups have plans to solve this scene, while others think it is too late to fix the problem. My outlook is more positive and I strongly believe still there are actions to prevent a fatal ending.
To begin with, there is a strong opinion about the actual damage to nature is irreversible. In this posture, the problem is that animals and plants had been affected by industrial activity and there is not any environment planning to prevent this destruction. For example, many researchers in the field show that each year almost two hundred species disappear and nothing can stop this process. Thus, according to this opinion, nothing can be done to solve the dramatic situation.
Nevertheless, I believe there is much work to do to avoid this process of destruction in our wildlife and on my point of view, there are three main points. In the first place, governments have the responsibility to run strong laws to limit the contamination in the industrial area, which is the first cause of mortality in plants and animals. Second, education is an important support to awareness people about the importance of ecology in daily life. And third, there must be a change in consuming policy, because due to this lifestyle is encouraging an uncontrolled industrial activity to cover the demand. If these three points are covered, there is a possibility to get some change in the current environmental problem.
To sum up, I completely believe that government and society can make several actions to turn this ecological disaster. Regulate industrial activity and create awareness about how much we can do, definitely can build a different future for our wildlife.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, still, third, thus, while, for example, to begin with, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04761904762 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8416245234 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585034013605 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8400497893 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280521295765 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825761207446 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481430176777 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156575122118 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401849753824 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.